For all the promise they have shown in the lab, polymer solar cells still need to ‘get on a roll’, just like the ones employed for printing newspapers. This would allow large sheets of efficient photovoltaic devices to be manufactured continuously and economically. Polymer solar cells offer advantages over their traditional silicon-based counterparts in numerous ways, including lower cost, potentially smaller carbon footprint and a greater variety of uses.

New results reported by an international team led by researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) indicate that the ‘sweet spot’ for mass-producing polymer solar cells – a tantalizing prospect for decades – may be far larger than dictated by conventional wisdom. In experiments using a mock-up of a high-volume, roll-to-roll processing method, the researchers produced polymer-based solar cells with a ‘power conversion efficiency’ of better than 9.5%, just shy of the minimum commercial target of 10%. The researchers report these results in a paper in Energy & Environmental Science.

That's almost as good as the small-batch devices made in the lab with spin-coating, a method that produces high-quality films in the laboratory but is commercially impractical since it wastes up to 90% of the initial material.

In a somewhat surprising finding, these mass-produced polymer solar cells exhibited molecular packing and texture that only slightly resembled that of lab-made varieties, which at their best convert about 11% of incident sunlight into electrical energy.

"The 'rule of thumb' has been that high-volume polymer solar cells should look just like those made in the lab in terms of structure, organization and shape at the nanometer scale," said Lee Richter, a NIST physicist who works on functional polymers. "Our experiments indicate that the requirements are much more flexible than assumed, allowing for greater structural variability without significantly sacrificing conversion efficiency."

"Efficient roll-to-roll fabrication is key to achieving the low-cost, high-volume production that would enable photovoltaics to scale to a significant fraction of global energy production," explained He Yan, a collaborator from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

"Efficient roll-to-roll fabrication is key to achieving the low-cost, high-volume production that would enable photovoltaics to scale to a significant fraction of global energy production."He Yan, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

The team were experimenting with a light-capturing material comprising a fluorinated polymer and fullerenes (also known as a ‘buckyballs’). Going by the technical name of PffBT4T-2OD, this material is attractive for scaled production – achieving a reported power conversion efficiency of more than 11%. Importantly, it can also be applied in relatively thick layers – conducive to roll-to-roll processing.

However, the top-performing solar cells made from this material were still produced with the spin-coating method, a small-batch process. In spin coating, a solution of the material is dispensed onto the center of a disk or other substrate, which rotates to spread the material until the desired coating thickness is achieved. Besides generating lots of waste, the process is piecemeal – rather than continuous – and substrate size is limited.

So the research team opted to test commercially-relevant coating methods, especially since PffBT4T-2OD can be applied in relatively thick layers of 250nm and more. They started by using blade-coating – akin to holding a knife edge a fraction of a hair's breadth above a treated glass substrate as it slides by –to paint the PffBT4T-2OD onto the substrate.

A series of X-ray-based measurements revealed that the temperature at which the PffBT4T-2OD was applied and dried significantly influenced the resultant coating's material structure – especially the orientation, spacing and distribution of the crystals that formed.

Substrates that were blade-coated at 90°C proved to be the highest performing, achieving power conversion efficiencies that topped 9.5%. Surprisingly, at the nanometer scale, the end products differed significantly from the spin-coated ‘champion’ devices made in the lab. Detailed real-time measurements during both blade-coating and spin-coating revealed that different structures arose from the rapid cooling during spin-coating versus the constant temperature during blade-coating.

"Real-time measurements were critical to developing a proper understanding of the film formation kinetics and ultimate optimization," said Aram Amassian, a collaborator from the King Abdullah University of Science & Technology in Saudi Arabia.

Encouraged by these results, the team performed preliminary measurements of a PffBT4T-2OD coating on the surface of a flexible plastic sheet. The coating was applied using NIST's slot-die roll-to-roll coating line, directly mimicking large-scale production. Measurements confirmed that the material structures made with blade-coating and those made with slot-die-coating were nearly identical when processed at the same temperatures.

"It's clear that the type of processing method used influences the shape of the domains and their size distribution in the final coating, but these distinctly different morphologies do not necessarily undermine performance," said Harald Ade, a collaborator from North Carolina State University. "We think these findings provide important clues for designing polymer solar cells optimized for roll-to-roll processing."

This story is adapted from material from NIST, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.