A 3D-printed hemispherical metamaterial, inspired by the compound eye of a moth, can absorb microwaves at select frequencies. Image: Hojat Rezaei Nejad, Tufts University, Nano Lab.
A 3D-printed hemispherical metamaterial, inspired by the compound eye of a moth, can absorb microwaves at select frequencies. Image: Hojat Rezaei Nejad, Tufts University, Nano Lab.

A team of engineers at Tufts University has developed a series of 3D printed metamaterials with unique microwave or optical properties that go beyond what is possible with conventional optical or electronic materials.

The fabrication methods developed by the researchers demonstrate the potential of 3D printing for expanding the range of geometric designs and material composites that lead to devices with novel optical properties. In one case, the researchers drew inspiration from the compound eye of a moth to create a hemispherical device that can absorb electromagnetic signals from any direction at selected wavelengths. They report their work in a paper in Microsystems & Nanoengineering.

Metamaterials extend the capabilities of conventional materials by making use of geometric features arranged in repeating patterns at scales smaller than the wavelengths of energy being detected or influenced. New developments in 3D printing technology are making it possible to create many more shapes and patterns of metamaterials, and at ever smaller scales. In this study, researchers at the Nano Lab at Tufts University developed a hybrid fabrication approach that used 3D printing, metal coating and etching to create metamaterials with complex geometries and novel functionalities for wavelengths in the microwave range.

For example, they created an array of tiny mushroom shaped structures, each holding a small patterned metal resonator at the top of a stalk. This particular arrangement permits microwaves of specific frequencies to be absorbed, depending on the chosen geometry of the ‘mushrooms’ and their spacing. Such metamaterials could be valuable for use as sensors in medical diagnosis, antennas in telecommunications and detectors in imaging applications.

Other devices printed by the authors include parabolic reflectors that selectively absorb and transmit certain frequencies. Such concepts could simplify optical devices by combining the functions of reflection and filtering into one unit.

"The ability to consolidate functions using metamaterials could be incredibly useful," said Sameer Sonkusale, professor of electrical and computer engineering at Tufts University's School of Engineering who heads the Nano Lab at Tufts and is corresponding author of the paper. "It's possible that we could use these materials to reduce the size of spectrometers and other optical measuring devices so they can be designed for portable field study."

The products created by combining optical/electronic patterning with 3D fabrication of the underlying substrate are referred to by the authors as metamaterials embedded with geometric optics (MEGOs). Other shapes, sizes and orientations of patterned 3D printing can be conceived to create MEGOs that absorb, enhance, reflect or bend waves in ways that would be difficult to achieve with conventional fabrication methods.

There are a number of technologies now available for 3D printing, and the current study utilizes stereolithography, which focuses light to polymerize photo-curable resins into the desired shapes. Other 3D printing technologies, such as two-photon polymerization, can provide printing resolution down to 200nm. This allows the fabrication of even finer metamaterials that can detect and manipulate electromagnetic signals of even smaller wavelengths, potentially including visible light.

"The full potential of 3D printing for MEGOs has not yet been realized," said Aydin Sadeqi, a graduate student in Sankusale's lab at Tufts University School of Engineering and lead author of the paper. "There is much more we can do with the current technology, and a vast potential as 3D printing inevitably evolves."

This story is adapted from material from Tufts University, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.