Proteins are among the most versatile and ubiquitous biomolecules on Earth. Nature uses them for everything from building tissues to regulating metabolism to defending the body against disease.

Now, a new study shows that proteins have additional, largely unexplored capabilities. Under the right conditions, they can act as tiny, current-carrying wires, useful for a range of human-designed nanoelectronics.

In a paper in ACS Nano, Stuart Lindsay and his colleagues at Arizona State University (ASU) report that certain proteins can act as efficient electrical conductors. In fact, these tiny protein wires may have better conductance properties than similar nanowires composed of DNA, which have already met with considerable success in a host of human applications.

Lindsay directs the Biodesign Center for Single-Molecule Biophysics. He is also a professor in ASU’s Department of Physics and the School of Molecular Sciences.

Just as with DNA, proteins offer many attractive properties for nanoscale electronics, including stability, tunable conductance and vast information-storage capacity. Although proteins had traditionally been regarded as poor conductors of electricity, all that recently changed when Lindsay and his colleagues demonstrated that a protein poised between a pair of electrodes could act as an efficient conductor of electrons.

This new research examines the phenomenon of electron transport through proteins in greater detail. Its findings establish that, over long distances, protein nanowires display better conductance properties than chemically synthesized nanowires specifically designed to be conductors. In addition, proteins are self-organizing and allow for atomic-scale control of their constituent parts.

Synthetically designed protein nanowires could give rise to new ultra-tiny electronics, with potential applications such as medical sensing and diagnostics, nanorobots for carrying out search and destroy missions against diseases, and a new breed of ultra-tiny computer transistors. Lindsay is particularly interested in the potential of protein nanowires for use in new devices to carry out ultra-fast DNA and protein sequencing, an area in which he has already made significant strides.

In addition to their role in nanoelectronic devices, charge-transport reactions are crucial in living systems for processes including respiration, metabolism and photosynthesis. Hence, research into modifying transport properties through designed proteins may shed new light on how such processes operate within living organisms.

While proteins have many of the benefits of DNA for nanoelectronics in terms of electrical conductance and self-assembly, the expanded alphabet of 20 amino acids used to construct them offers an enhanced toolkit for nanoarchitects like Lindsay, compared with the four nucleotides making up DNA.

Though electron transport has been a focus of considerable research, the nature of the flow of electrons through proteins has remained something of a mystery. Broadly speaking, this process can occur through electron tunneling, a quantum effect occurring over very short distances, or through the hopping of electrons along a peptide chain – in the case of proteins, a chain of amino acids.

One objective of this study was to determine which of these regimes seemed to be operating, by making quantitative measurements of electrical conductance over different lengths of protein nanowire. The study also describes a mathematical model that can be used to calculate the molecular-electronic properties of proteins.

For the experiments, the researchers used protein segments in 4nm increments, from 4–20nm in length. A gene was designed to produce these amino acid sequences from a DNA template, with the protein lengths then bonded together into longer molecules. A highly sensitive instrument known as a scanning tunneling microscope was used to make precise measurements of conductance as electron transport progressed along the protein nanowire.

The data showed that conductance decreases over nanowire length in a manner consistent with hopping, rather than tunnelling, behavior of the electrons. Specific aromatic amino acid residues (six tyrosines and one tryptophan in each corkscrew twist of the protein) help guide the electrons along their path from point to point, like successive stations along a train route.

“The electron transport is sort of like skipping a stone across water – the stone hasn't got time to sink on each skip,” Lindsay says.

While the conductance values of the protein nanowires decreased over distance, they did so more gradually than in conventional molecular wires specifically designed to be efficient conductors.

When the protein nanowires exceeded 6nm in length, their conductance outperformed molecular nanowires, opening the door to their use in many new applications. The fact that they can be subtly designed and altered with atomic scale control and self-assembled from a gene template permits fine-tuned manipulations that far exceed what can currently be achieved with conventional transistor design.

One exciting possibility is using such protein nanowires to connect other components in a new suite of nanomachines. For example, nanowires could be used to connect an enzyme known as a DNA polymerase to electrodes, resulting in a device that could potentially sequence an entire human genome at low cost in under an hour. A similar approach could allow the integration of proteosomes into nanoelectronic devices able to read amino acids for protein sequencing.

“We are beginning now to understand the electron transport in these proteins. Once you have quantitative calculations, not only do you have great molecular electronic components, but you have a recipe for designing them,” Lindsay says. “If you think of the SPICE program that electrical engineers use to design circuits, there's a glimmer now that you could get this for protein electronics.”

This story is adapted from material from Arizona State University, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.

ASU’s Stuart Lindsay. Photo: The Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University.
ASU’s Stuart Lindsay. Photo: The Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University.