This image shows how polymer crystallization speed can be used to control the spatial distribution of nanoparticles. Impurities (here, the nanoparticles) will become engulfed by the crystal if it grows too rapidly; when the rate slows, however, the crystal will expel the defects. Image: Sanat Kumar/Columbia Engineering.For the first time, researchers at the Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science have demonstrated a new technique that takes its inspiration from the nacre of oyster shells, a composite material that has extraordinary mechanical properties, including great strength and resilience.
By changing the crystallization speed of a polymer that was initially well-mixed with nanoparticles, the team was able to control how the nanoparticles self-assemble into structures at three very different length scales. This multiscale ordering can make the base material almost an order of magnitude stiffer, while still retaining the desired deformability and lightweight behavior of the polymeric materials. The study appears in a paper in ACS Central Science.
"Essentially, we have created a one-step method to build a composite material that is significantly stronger than its host material," says Sanat Kumar, an expert in polymer dynamics and self-assembly who led the study. "Our technique may improve the mechanical and potentially other physical properties of commercially-relevant plastic materials, with applications in automobiles, protective coatings and food/beverage packaging, things we use every day. And, looking further ahead, we may also be able to produce interesting electronic or optical properties of the nanocomposite materials, potentially enabling the fabrication of new materials and functional devices that can be used in structural applications such as buildings, but with the ability to monitor their health in situ."
About 75% of commercially-used polymers, including polyethylene for packaging and polypropylene for bottles, are semi-crystalline. These materials have low mechanical strength and thus cannot be used for many advanced applications, including automobile fittings like tires, fanbelts, bumpers, etc.
Researchers have known for decades, going back to the early 1900s, that varying nanoparticle dispersion in materials like polymers, metals and ceramics can dramatically improve their properties. A good example in nature is nacre, which is 95% inorganic aragonite and 5% crystalline polymer (chitin); its hierarchical nanoparticle ordering – a mixture of intercalated brittle platelets and thin layers of elastic biopolymers – strongly improves its mechanical properties. In addition, parallel aragonite layers, held together by a nanoscale (10nm thick) crystalline biopolymer layer, form ‘bricks’ that subsequently assemble into ‘brick-and-mortar’ superstructures at the micrometer scale and larger. This arrangement, at multiple length sizes, greatly increases nacre’s toughness.
"While achieving the spontaneous assembly of nanoparticles into a hierarchy of scales in a polymer host has been a 'holy grail' in nanoscience, until now there has been no established method to achieve this goal," says Dan Zhao, Kumar's PhD student and first author of the paper. "We addressed this challenge through the controlled, multiscale assembly of nanoparticles by leveraging the kinetics of polymer crystallization."
While researchers focusing on polymer nanocomposites have achieved facile control of nanoparticle organization in an amorphous polymer matrix (i.e. the polymer does not crystallize), to date no one has been able to tune nanoparticle assembly in a crystalline polymer matrix. One related approach relied on ice-templating. Using this technique, investigators have crystallized small molecules (predominantly water) to organize colloid particles. Due to the intrinsic kinetics of this process, however, the particles are normally expelled into the microscale grain boundaries, and so researchers have not been able to order nanoparticles across the multiple scales necessary to mimic nacre.
Kumar's group are experts in tuning the structure and therefore the properties of polymer nanocomposites. They found that, by mixing nanoparticles in a solution of polymers (polyethylene oxide) and changing the crystallization speed by varying the degree of sub-cooling (namely how far below the melting point the crystallization was conducted), they could control how the nanoparticles self-assembled at three different scale regimes: nano-, micro- and macro-meter. Each nanoparticle was evenly covered by the polymers and evenly spaced before the crystallization process began. The nanoparticles then assembled into sheets (10–100 nm) and the sheets into aggregates on the microscale (1–10 μm) as the polymer crystallized.
"This controlled self-assembly is important because it improves the stiffness of the materials while keeping them tough," says Kumar. "And the materials retain the low density of the pure semi-crystalline polymer so that we can keep the weight of a structural component low, a property that is critical to applications such as cars and planes, where weight is a critical consideration. With our versatile approach, we can vary either the particle or the polymer to achieve some specific material behavior or device performance."
Kumar's team next plans to examine the fundamentals that allow particles to move toward certain regions of the system, and to develop methods to speed up the kinetics of particle ordering, which currently takes a few days. They then plan to explore other application-driven polymer/particle systems, such as polylactide/nanoparticle systems that can be engineered as next-generation biodegradable and sustainable polymer nanocomposites, and polyethylene/silica, which is used in car bumpers, buildings and bridges.
"The potential of replacing structural materials with these new composites could have a profound effect on sustainable materials as well as our nation's' infrastructure," Kumar says.
This story is adapted from material from the Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.