Berkeley Lab researchers have found that text mining of materials science abstracts can turn up novel thermoelectric materials. Image: Berkeley Lab.
Berkeley Lab researchers have found that text mining of materials science abstracts can turn up novel thermoelectric materials. Image: Berkeley Lab.

Sure, computers can be used to play grandmaster-level chess, but can they make scientific discoveries? Researchers at the US Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have now shown that an algorithm with no training in materials science can scan the text of millions of papers and uncover new scientific knowledge.

A team led by Anubhav Jain, a scientist in Berkeley Lab's Energy Storage & Distributed Resources Division, collected 3.3 million abstracts of published materials science papers and fed them into an algorithm called Word2vec. By analyzing relationships between words, this algorithm was able to predict discoveries of new thermoelectric materials years in advance and suggest as-yet unknown materials as candidates for future thermoelectric materials.

"Without telling it anything about materials science, it learned concepts like the periodic table and the crystal structure of metals," said Jain. "That hinted at the potential of the technique. But probably the most interesting thing we figured out is you can use this algorithm to address gaps in materials research, things that people should study but haven't studied so far." Jain and his colleagues reported their findings in a paper in Nature.

"The paper establishes that text mining of scientific literature can uncover hidden knowledge, and that pure text-based extraction can establish basic scientific knowledge," said Gerbrand Ceder, a Berkeley lab scientist who also has an appointment in the University of California, Berkeley's Department of Materials Science and Engineering.

According to Vahe Tshitoyan, a Berkeley Lab postdoctoral fellow now working at Google, the project was motivated by the difficulty making sense of the overwhelming amount of published studies. "In every research field there's 100 years of past research literature, and every week dozens more studies come out," he said. "A researcher can access only fraction of that. We thought, can machine learning do something to make use of all this collective knowledge in an unsupervised manner – without needing guidance from human researchers?"

The team collected the 3.3 million abstracts from papers published in more than 1000 journals between 1922 and 2018. Word2vec took each of the approximately 500,000 distinct words in those abstracts and turned each into a 200-dimensional vector, or an array of 200 numbers.

"What's important is not each number, but using the numbers to see how words are related to one another," said Jain, who leads a group working on discovery and design of new materials for energy applications using a mix of theory, computation and data mining. "For example, you can subtract vectors using standard vector math. Other researchers have shown that if you train the algorithm on non-scientific text sources and take the vector that results from 'king minus queen,' you get the same result as 'man minus woman.' It figures out the relationship without you telling it anything."

Similarly, when trained on materials science text, the algorithm was able to learn the meaning of scientific terms and concepts such as the crystal structure of metals based simply on the positions of the words in the abstracts and their co-occurrence with other words. For example, just as it could solve the equation ‘king - queen + man’, it could figure out that for the equation ‘ferromagnetic - NiFe + IrMn’ the answer would be ‘antiferromagnetic’. Word2vec was even able to learn the relationships between elements on the periodic table when the vector for each chemical element was projected onto two dimensions.

So if Word2vec is so smart, could it predict novel thermoelectric materials? A good thermoelectric material can efficiently convert heat to electricity, and is made of materials that are safe, abundant and easy to produce.

The Berkeley Lab team took the top thermoelectric candidates suggested by the algorithm, which ranked each compound by the similarity of its word vector to that of the word ‘thermoelectric’. Then they ran calculations to verify the algorithm's predictions.

Of the top 10 predictions, they found all had computed power factors slightly higher than the average of known thermoelectrics; the top three candidates had power factors at above the 95th percentile of known thermoelectrics.

Next, they tested if the algorithm could perform experiments ‘in the past’ by giving it abstracts only up to, say, the year 2000. Again, of the top predictions, a significant number turned up in later studies – four times more than if the materials had just been chosen at random. For example, three of the top five predictions trained using data up to the year 2008 have since been discovered, while the remaining two contain rare or toxic elements.

The results were surprising. "I honestly didn't expect the algorithm to be so predictive of future results," Jain said. "I had thought maybe the algorithm could be descriptive of what people had done before but not come up with these different connections. I was pretty surprised when I saw not only the predictions but also the reasoning behind the predictions, things like the half-Heusler structure, which is a really hot crystal structure for thermoelectrics these days.

"This study shows that if this algorithm were in place earlier, some materials could have conceivably been discovered years in advance."

Along with the study, the researchers are releasing the top 50 thermoelectric materials predicted by the algorithm. They'll also be releasing the word embeddings needed for people to make their own applications, if they want to search for, say, a better topological insulator.

Up next, Jain said the team is working on a smarter, more powerful search engine, allowing researchers to search abstracts in a more useful way.

This story is adapted from material from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.