Novel zirconium-free alloy makes safer nuclear cladding

A team led by researchers at the US Department of Energy (DOE)'s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has developed a safer cladding for nuclear fuel rods.

The new material, an alloy of iron, chromium and aluminum, avoids zirconium. As a result, it should give plant operators substantially more time to react to incidents such as a station blackout.

The fuel rods at civilian nuclear power plants have been sheathed with an evolving zirconium alloy for the past six decades. Zirconium as the preferred base metal was chosen in the 1950s by Hyman Rickover, then a captain and later an admiral, as he worked to utilize nuclear technology for powering ships and submarines.

His choice of cladding, as well as the light-water reactors that powered these vessels, was then adapted by the nuclear power industry and now dominates plants throughout the world.

Zirconium absorbs very few of the neutrons that drive a nuclear reactor, so zirconium alloys made sense as a fuel cladding – as long as the reactor operated as planned. If a reactor loses its cooling water, however, the zirconium can make a bad problem worse.

"The issue is you have anywhere between 20 and 40 tons of zirconium metal in these reactor cores," explained ORNL nuclear engineer Kurt Terrani, who heads up the project. "Zirconium reacts with steam at high temperature, and when it reacts it produces a lot of heat and a lot of hydrogen."

The job for Terrani's team, as the innovation engine of a consortium led by General Electric, was to create a zirconium-free alloy that would generate as little hydrogen as possible during incidents. At the same time, however, it needed to match the performance of the nuclear fuel rod cladding in use today.

The project was out of the ordinary for at least three reasons, Terrani explained. In the first place, the team was not interested in testing existing alloys to see if one might be appropriate. Instead, it designed the new alloy from scratch by putting together a diverse team that included experts in nuclear engineering, materials science, radiation effects, corrosion, thermomechanics and alloy fabrication.

This approach made use of the wide range of tools and expertise available at ORNL, DOE's biggest science and energy laboratory. The new cladding also underwent testing at ORNL's High Flux Isotope Reactor and Idaho National Laboratory's Advanced Test Reactor, as well as the Halden research reactor in Norway.

"This was by no means an Edisonian approach," Terrani said, alluding to the trial-and-error approach made famous by Thomas Edison. "We worked with knowledge and tools that were not available in Rickover's day. We designed an alloy that we knew was going to work. I'm not surprised that this alloy behaves so well under different conditions; we designed it to do so."

Secondly, the team was able to identify and produce the alloy in six years, which is lightning fast in the nuclear industry. Conventional wisdom says the project should have taken twice the time, Terrani said.

Thirdly, he added, the project is unusual because the research and development is complete. "The other thing I'm very proud of is we are ready to stop working on this," he said. "We feel like we delivered it, the industry is running with it. We want to put a big fat red bow on it."

The alloy has now been turned over to the industry for testing and evaluation. The new cladding was placed in a reactor at Southern Nuclear's Hatch Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia for testing in February, Terrani said, and subsequent installations are planned.

This story is adapted from material from ORNL, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.