This is a magnified image of a superstructure built from nanoscale tetrahedral building blocks. The edges of each block are about 9nm in length, while superstructures built from them are 200–300µm across. Image: Chen Lab/Brown University.
This is a magnified image of a superstructure built from nanoscale tetrahedral building blocks. The edges of each block are about 9nm in length, while superstructures built from them are 200–300µm across. Image: Chen Lab/Brown University.

Researchers from Brown University have assembled complex macroscale superstructures from pyramid-shaped nanoparticle building blocks. This study, reported in a paper in Nature, demonstrates a promising new way to bring the useful properties of nanoparticles to macroscale materials and devices.

"There's been a lot of research in making superstructures from spherical nanoparticles, but much less using tetrahedral building blocks," said Ou Chen, an assistant professor of chemistry at Brown and senior author of the study. "Tetrahedra open the possibility of making much more complex structures, and the 3D superstructure we demonstrate here is one of the most complex ever assembled from single nanoparticle components."

Chen's research group developed the building blocks used in the study a year ago. The particles are quantum dots – nanoscale semiconductors that can absorb and emit light. Their tetrahedral (pyramid-like) shape has important advantages over spheres, Chen says, when using them to build larger structures. Tetrahedra can pack together with less void space than spheres, making the structures potentially more robust. In addition, the particles used in the study are anisotropic, meaning they have different properties depending upon their orientation relative to each other. Spheres, on the other hand, are the same in every direction.

In the case of the tetrahedral quantum dots, anisotropy was generated by treating one flat face, or facet, of each pyramid with a different ligand (a chemical bonding agent). "Ligands help direct the touching process that occurs when two particles come together facet-to-facet," explained Yasutaka Nagaoka, a postdoctoral researcher in Chen's group and the major contributor to the study. "In this case, facets with like ligands attract, which offers a degree of control over how the particles arrange themselves." That's in contrast to isotropic spheres, which arrange themselves randomly.

"Anisotropy adds to the complexity of the superstructures we can make compared to using isotropic spheres," Chen said. "It also gives us some power to control the atomic alignment of the particles in the supercrystals, which could give rise to interesting properties. For example, you can predict that alignment will give rise to better electronic properties because electrons hop more easily through the lattice of the superstructure."

For this study, Chen and his colleagues dissolved their tetrahedral quantum dots in solution, then allowed the particles to assemble into three different types of superstructures: one-dimensional strands, two-dimensional crystal lattices and three-dimensional (3D) supercrystals.

The 3D supercrystals were particularly interesting, Chen says, because of their complexity and the interesting way in which they formed. The individual nanoparticles first formed ball-like clusters each comprising 36 particles, which then came together to form the larger superstructures. When the researchers characterized the structure in detail using X-ray scattering, they found that the atomic structure of the lattice was indeed aligned, as they had hoped.

Now that they've demonstrated a method for forming the structures, the next step is to interrogate their properties. "The quantum dot building blocks are interesting by themselves," Chen said. "They have interesting photon dynamics, which may translate into interesting optical properties in the superstructures.

"We need to understand how to assemble these larger and more complex structures. I think these will be a bridge that will bring nanoscale dynamics into the macroscale and enable new types of metamaterials and devices."

This story is adapted from material from Brown University, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.