Produced from computer simulations, this image shows the response of a graphene surface as a silicon tip slides over it. Relative forces of atomic friction on the surface are shown by colors: red points are ‘pushing’ sites that help propel the tip along the surface, while blue points are ‘pinning’ sites of greater friction that inhibit the tip’s motion. Image courtesy of the researchers.Graphene, a two-dimensional (2D) form of carbon comprising layers just one atom in thick, has been the subject of widespread research, in large part because of its unique combination of strength, electrical conductivity and chemical stability. But despite many years of study, some of graphene's fundamental properties are still not well understood, including the way it behaves when something slides along its surface.
Now, using powerful computer simulations, researchers at Massachusetts of Technology (MIT) and elsewhere have made significant strides in understanding that process. This includes determining why the friction varies as an object slides across graphene, instead of remaining constant as it does with most other known materials.
The findings appear in a paper in Nature by Ju Li, professor of nuclear science and engineering and of materials science and engineering at MIT, and seven other researchers at MIT, the University of Pennsylvania, and universities in China and Germany.
Graphite, a bulk material composed of many layers of graphene, is a well-known solid lubricant (just like oil, it can be added between contacting materials to reduce friction). Recent research suggests that even one or a few layers of graphene can also provide effective lubrication, which could prove of use in small-scale thermal and electrical contacts and other nanoscale devices.
In such applications, an understanding of the friction between two pieces of graphene, or between graphene and another material, is important for maintaining a good electrical, thermal and mechanical connection. Researchers had previously found that while one layer of graphene on a surface reduces friction, having a few more was even better. However, the reason for this was not well understood.
"There is this broad notion in tribology that friction depends on the true contact area," Li says – that is, the area where two materials are really in contact, down to the atomic level. The ‘true’ contact area is often substantially smaller than it appears to be if observed at larger scales. Determining the true contact area is important for understanding not only the degree of friction between materials, but also other characteristics such as electrical conduction and heat transfer.
For example, explains co-author Robert Carpick of the University of Pennsylvania: "When two parts in a machine make contact, like two teeth of steel gears, the actual amount of steel in contact is much smaller than it appears, because the gear teeth are rough, and contact only occurs at the topmost protruding points on the surfaces. If the surfaces were polished to be flatter so that twice as much area was in contact, the friction would then be twice as high. In other words, the friction force doubles if the true area of direct contact doubles."
It turns out, however, that the situation is even more complex than originally thought. Li and his colleagues found that other aspects of the contact also influence how the friction force gets transferred across it. "We call this the quality of contact, as opposed to the quantity of contact measured by the 'true contact' area," Li explains.
Experimental observations had shown that when a nanoscale object slides along a single layer of graphene, the friction force actually increases at first, before eventually leveling off. This effect lessens, and the leveled-off friction force decreases, when sliding on more and more graphene sheets. This phenomenon has also been seen in other layered materials including molybdenum disulfide. Previous attempts to explain this variation in friction, not seen in anything other than these 2D materials, had fallen short.
To determine the quality of contact, it is necessary to know the exact position of each atom on each of the two surfaces. The quality of contact depends on how well-aligned the atomic configurations are in the two surfaces in contact, and on the synchrony of these alignments. According to the computer simulations, these factors turned out to be more important than the ‘true’ contact area in explaining the materials' frictional behavior.
"You cannot explain the increase in friction" as the material begins to slide "by just the contact area," Li says. "Most of the change in friction is actually due to change in the quality of contact, not the true contact area." The researchers found that the act of sliding causes graphene atoms to make better contact with the object sliding along it; this increase in the quality of contact leads to an increase in friction as sliding proceeds, before the friction eventually levels off. The effect is strong for a single layer of graphene because it is so flexible that the atoms can move to locations of better contact.
A number of factors can affect the quality of contact, including the rigidity of the surfaces, slight curvatures and gas molecules that get in between the two solid layers, Li says. But by understanding the way the process works, engineers can now take specific steps to modify the frictional behavior of graphene to match a particular intended use. For example, ‘prewrinkling’ of the graphene material can give it more flexibility and improve the quality of contact. "We can use that to vary the friction by a factor of three, while the true contact area barely changes," he states.
"In other words, it's not just the material itself" that determines how it slides, but also its boundary condition – including whether it is loose and wrinkled or flat and taut, Li explains. And these principles apply not just to graphene but also to other 2D materials, such as molybdenum disulfide, boron nitride, and other single-atom or single-molecule-thick materials.
"Potentially, a moving mechanical contact could be used as a way to make very good power switches in small electronic devices," Li says. But that is still some way off; while graphene is a promising material being widely studied, "we're still waiting to see graphene electronics and 2D electronics take off. It's an emerging field."
This story is adapted from material from MIT, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.