An approximately 1mm-diameter sample of lutetium hydride. This composite image is the result of focus stacking and color-enhancing several images. Image: University of Rochester photo/J. Adam Fenster.
An approximately 1mm-diameter sample of lutetium hydride. This composite image is the result of focus stacking and color-enhancing several images. Image: University of Rochester photo/J. Adam Fenster.

In a historic achievement, a team of researchers at the University of Rochester has created a superconducting material that operates at both a temperature and pressure low enough for practical applications.

According to the team, which is led by Ranga Dias, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering and physics, “with this material, the dawn of ambient superconductivity and applied technologies has arrived”. In a paper in Nature, the researchers describe a nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride (NDLH) that exhibits superconductivity at 69°F and 10 kilobars (145,000 pounds per square inch (psi)) of pressure.

Although 145,000 psi might still seem extraordinarily high (pressure at sea level is about 15 psi), the strain-engineering techniques routinely used in chip manufacturing incorporate materials held together by internal chemical pressures that are even higher.

Scientists have been pursuing this breakthrough in condensed matter physics for more than a century. In superconducting materials, electrical resistance vanishes, and the magnetic fields that are expelled pass around the material. Such materials could lead to: power grids that transmit electricity without loss of energy; frictionless, levitating high-speed trains; more affordable medical imaging and scanning techniques such as MRI and magnetocardiography; faster, more efficient electronics for digital logic and memory device technology; and tokamak machines that use magnetic fields to confine plasmas to achieve fusion as a source of unlimited power.

Previously, in papers in Nature and Physical Review Letters, the Dias team reported creating two materials – carbonaceous sulfur hydride and yttrium superhydride – that are superconducting at 58°F/39 million psi and 12°F/26 million psi respectively (see Hydrogen-rich material pressured into superconducting at room temperature).

Given the importance of this new discovery, Dias and his team went to unusual lengths to document their research and head off criticism that developed in the wake of their previous Nature paper, which led to a retraction by the journal’s editors. The previous paper has since been resubmitted to Nature with new data that validates the earlier work, Dias says. This new data was collected outside the lab, at the Argonne and Brookhaven National Laboratories in front of an audience of scientists who saw the superconducting transition live. A similar approach has been taken with the new paper.

Five graduate students in Dias’s lab—Nathan Dasenbrock-Gammon, Elliot Snider, Raymond McBride, Hiranya Pasan and Dylan Durkee —are listed as co-lead authors of the new paper. “Everyone in the group was involved in doing the experiments,” Dias says. “It was truly a collective effort.”

Hydrides created by combining rare earth metals with hydrogen, then adding nitrogen or carbon, have provided researchers a tantalizing ‘working recipe’ for creating superconducting materials in recent years. In technical terms, rare earth metal hydrides form clathrate-like cage structures, where the rare earth metal ions act as carrier donors, providing sufficient electrons to enhance the dissociation of the hydrogen molecules. Meanwhile, nitrogen and carbon help stabilize the materials. As a result, less pressure is required for superconductivity to occur.

In addition to yttrium, researchers have tried using other rare earth metals. However, the resulting compounds become superconductive at temperatures or pressures that are still not practical for applications.

So, this time, Dias looked elsewhere along the periodic table.

Lutetium looked like “a good candidate to try,” Dias says. It has highly localized, fully-filled 14 electrons in its f orbital configuration, which acts to suppress phonon softening and enhance the electron-phonon coupling needed for superconductivity to take place at ambient temperatures. “The key question was, how are we going to stabilize this to lower the required pressure? And that’s where nitrogen came into the picture.”

Nitrogen, like carbon, has a rigid atomic structure that can be used to create a more stable, cage-like lattice within a material, and it also hardens the low-frequency optical phonons. This structure provides the stability for superconductivity to occur at a lower pressure.

Dias’s team created a gas mixture comprising 99% hydrogen and 1% nitrogen, placed it in a reaction chamber with a pure sample of lutetium, and let the components react for two to three days at 392°F.

The resulting lutetium-nitrogen-hydrogen compound was initially a “lustrous bluish color,” the paper states. When the compound was then compressed in a diamond anvil cell, a “startling visual transformation” occurred: from blue to pink at the onset of superconductivity, and then to a bright red non-superconducting metallic state.

“It was a very bright red,” Dias says. “I was shocked to see colors of this intensity. We humorously suggested a code name for the material at this state – reddmatter – after a material that Spock created in the popular 2009 Star Trek movie.” The code name stuck.

The 145,000 psi of pressure required to induce superconductivity is nearly two orders of magnitude lower than the previous lowest pressure created in Dias’s lab.

With funding support from Dias’s National Science Foundation CAREER award and a grant from the US Department of Energy, his lab has now answered the question of whether a superconducting material can exist at both ambient temperatures and pressures low enough for practical applications.

“A pathway to superconducting consumer electronics, energy transfer lines, transportation and significant improvements of magnetic confinement for fusion are now a reality,” Dias says. “We believe we are now at the modern superconducting era.”

For example, Dias predicts that the nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride will greatly accelerate progress in developing tokamak machines to achieve fusion. Instead of using powerful, converging laser beams to implode a fuel pellet, tokamaks rely on strong magnetic fields emitted by a doughnut-shaped enclosure to trap, hold and ignite super-heated plasmas. NDLH, which produces an “enormous magnetic field” at room temperatures, “will be a game-changer” for the emerging technology.

Particularly exciting, according to Dias, is the possibility of training machine-learning algorithms with the accumulated data from superconducting experimentation in his lab to predict other possible superconducting materials – in effect, mixing and matching from thousands of possible combinations of rare earth metals, nitrogen, hydrogen and carbon.

“In day-to-day life we have many different metals we use for different applications, so we will also need different kinds of superconducting materials,” he says. “Just like we use different metals for different applications, we need more ambient superconductors for different applications.”

Co-author Keith Lawlor has already begun developing algorithms and making calculations using supercomputing resources available through the University of Rochester’s Center for Integrated Research Computing.

Dias’s research group recently moved into a new, expanded lab on the third floor of Hopeman Hall on the River Campus. This is the first step in an ambitious plan to launch a degree-granting Center for Superconducting Innovation (CSI) at the University of Rochester, he says. The center would create an ecosystem for drawing additional faculty and scientists to the university to advance the science of superconductivity. The trained students would broaden the pool of researchers in the field.

“Our hope is to make upstate New York the hub for superconducting technology,” Dias says.

This story is adapted from material from the University of Rochester, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.